2012/2/22 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I had to reply to query about usage VACUUM ANALYZE or ANALYZE. I
>> expected so ANALYZE should be faster then VACUUM ANALYZE.
>>
>> But is not true. Why?
>
> I'm pretty sure that VACUUM ANALYZE *will* be faster than ANALYZE in
> general, because VACUUM has to scan the whole table, and ANALYZE only
> a fixed-size subset of its pages.
It sounds like you just said the opposite of what you wanted to say.
Nicolas
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
