Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shinya Kato
Subject Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date
Msg-id CAOzEurRRfPaZn_ZGmoDz2C3+74SAhk+FUZo_9oB1Zg_rQNGkYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness  (Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:55 PM Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:42 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:08:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > I have applied 0001 for now to add ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE.  Attached is
> > > the remaining piece.
> >
> > And the second piece is now applied as of e2bab2d79204.
> > --
> > Michael
>
> Hi,
>
> Should we consider preventing tab completion for PARTITION BY
> immediately after CREATE TABLE name (...)? Or is it fine to leave it
> as is, given that it's syntactically correct?

Sorry.
CREATE TABLE name (...) -> CREATE UNLOGGED TABLE name (...)


--
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Enhance pg_createsubscriber to create required standby.
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart