On Wednesday, July 24, 2013, Stephen Frost wrote:
Still, if there's a reasonable way to collect the stack info without going through the error callbacks, without implementing a duplicate system, I'm all ears.
That said, I'll work on making this more independent of the error handling and see if it can be made to use an independent memory context and try to tighten it up to ensure it isn't called in an error case. Future callers may try to.
Thanks,
Stephen
