Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Maciek Sakrejda
Subject Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date
Msg-id CAOtHd0DUMzNMG8Sprd0hXM_WOUerpeUy8s-rXoePWHxUnfWmtw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
In the pg_stat_statements docs, there are several column descriptions like

   Total number of ... by the statement

You added an additional sentence to some describing the equivalent
pg_stat_io values, but you only added a period to the previous
sentence for shared_blks_read (for other columns, the additional
description just follows directly). These should be consistent.

Otherwise, the docs look good to me.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: add \dpS to psql
Next
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query