Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Maciek Sakrejda
Subject Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans
Date
Msg-id CAOtHd0AxzXP+QampsQBm_DTBkyGNrRNLsJ2846r6oFi1ypr9VQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Okay. Does not getting as many workers as it asks for include
sometimes getting zero, completely changing the actual output? If so,
I'll submit a new version of the patch removing all tests--I was
hoping to improve coverage, but I guess this is not the way to start.
If not, can we keep the json tests at least if we only consider the
first worker?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jesse Zhang
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel grouping sets
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation