Re: Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs
From | Peter Kroon |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3 |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAOh+DOnhEF8zPzAOr9KfAKu33VwoxY1fCGB4wu6vymqBM+8gyQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3 (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3
|
List | pgsql-bugs |
>you can test your queries from pgAdmin SQL executor I have already done so. I'll look into the logs. 2013/2/19 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> > 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>: > >>try to use pgAdminIII > > > > Could you be more specific? > > you can test your queries from pgAdmin SQL executor > > but it is strange error - try to look to postgresql and system logs > > Pavel > > > > > > > 2013/2/19 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> > >> > >> 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>: > >> > Where can I check and/or alter this? > >> > >> try to use pgAdminIII > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Pavel > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > 2013/2/19 Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net> > >> >> > >> >> I wonder if there's a difference in the implementation(s) of readline > >> >> buffering? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >> From: Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com> > >> >> To: Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net> > >> >> Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, > >> >> pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org > >> >> Sent: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:28:47 -0000 (UTC) > >> >> Subject: Re: [BUGS] Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3 > >> >> > >> >> Exceeding length 4679 is a problem. Query results(length) equal or > >> >> below > >> >> this number succeed. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com> > >> >>> > >> >>> When there are more then 88 rows in the table like 595 I can run the > >> >>> query with success when using: WHERE id BETWEEN 1 AND 88; > >> >>> > >> >>> Using LIMIT 88 fails -> returns nothing > >> >>> Selecting all fails as well. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> When there are in __table_to_table more than 88 rows nothing gets > >> >>>> returned, otherwise the query rolls out fine. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> It appears to be a Windows issue only. > >> >>>>> I'll try to post some code. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> 2013/2/19 Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Seems your testing from different environments like that could > >> >>>>>> easily > >> >>>>>> add any mix of libpq client libraries into the equation (??) > >> >>>>>> (Are both test machines running the same version of pgAdmin? and > >> >>>>>> are > >> >>>>>> both connecting using the libpq installed with them?) > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> We have plenty of experience with clients reporting varying > >> >>>>>> behavior > >> >>>>>> from our 'applications', when it turns out they've 'hooked into' > an > >> >>>>>> unexpected version of the libpq client without, for example, SSL > >> >>>>>> support > >> >>>>>> built in, or Kerberos, or... This often happens after the client > >> >>>>>> has > >> >>>>>> unwittingly modified his environment in some way, sometimes after > >> >>>>>> installing > >> >>>>>> software. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> While the 'support libraries' issues above have no bearing on > your > >> >>>>>> case, of course, I certainly don't know enough to know that the > >> >>>>>> different > >> >>>>>> versions of libpq don't present xmlagg output differently! > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> The experts here will weigh in. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Lou Picciano > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >>>>>> From: Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Sent: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:52:37 -0000 (UTC) > >> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [BUGS] Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3 > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > When I'm on the sql machine via localhost or 192.168.1.100 I'm > >> >>>>>> > getting results. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> I mean when I'm physically behind the machine and login via > pgadmin > >> >>>>>> using localhost or 192.168.1.100 then I get results. > >> >>>>>> When I'm on another machine and login via pgadmin(192.168.1.100) > >> >>>>>> then > >> >>>>>> I get no results. > >> >>>>>> Not sure what to think of this... > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> >Don't you have for example problems with the client application > >> >>>>>>> > you > >> >>>>>>> > use? > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Yes, with 1 table only. I'm not getting any results. > >> >>>>>>> When I'm on the sql machine via localhost or 192.168.1.100 I'm > >> >>>>>>> getting results. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> 2013/2/19 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Peter Kroon < > plakroon@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Also no result with FROM __my_table LIMIT 1; > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> I'm having correct results with PG 9.2 by using either xmlagg > or > >> >>>>>>>> xmlelement. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> For example: > >> >>>>>>>> postgres=# SELECT xmlelement(name el_name, id) FROM __table > LIMIT > >> >>>>>>>> 1; > >> >>>>>>>> xmlelement > >> >>>>>>>> ---------------------- > >> >>>>>>>> <el_name>1</el_name> > >> >>>>>>>> Or: > >> >>>>>>>> postgres=# SELECT xmlagg(xmlelement(name el_name, id)) FROM > >> >>>>>>>> __table; > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> xmlagg > >> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------ > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> <el_name>1</el_name><el_name>2</el_name> > >> >>>>>>>> (1 row) > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Btw, such simple tests would have failed on the buildfarm for > >> >>>>>>>> regression xml.sql, so this looks to be an error in your > >> >>>>>>>> environment. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Don't you have for example problems with the client application > >> >>>>>>>> you > >> >>>>>>>> use? > >> >>>>>>>> -- > >> >>>>>>>> Michael > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > > >
pgsql-bugs by date: