Re: Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Kroon
Subject Re: Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3
Date
Msg-id CAOh+DOmrK3m1icoTYv1yuuisYD7WuAKyFnO8o5DAxMCc6UOJjg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3
List pgsql-bugs
>try to use pgAdminIII

Could you be more specific?


2013/2/19 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

> 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>:
> > Where can I check and/or alter this?
>
> try to use pgAdminIII
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
> >
> >
> > 2013/2/19 Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net>
> >>
> >> I wonder if there's a difference in the implementation(s) of readline
> >> buffering?
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>
> >> To: Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net>
> >> Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
> pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
> >> Sent: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:28:47 -0000 (UTC)
> >> Subject: Re: [BUGS] Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3
> >>
> >> Exceeding length 4679 is a problem. Query results(length) equal or below
> >> this number succeed.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> When there are more then 88 rows in the table like 595 I can run the
> >>> query with success when using: WHERE id BETWEEN 1 AND 88;
> >>>
> >>> Using LIMIT 88 fails -> returns nothing
> >>> Selecting all fails as well.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> When there are in __table_to_table more than 88 rows nothing gets
> >>>> returned, otherwise the query rolls out fine.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It appears to be a Windows issue only.
> >>>>> I'll try to post some code.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2013/2/19 Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Seems your testing from different environments like that could
> easily
> >>>>>> add any mix of libpq client libraries into the equation (??)
> >>>>>> (Are both test machines running the same version of pgAdmin? and are
> >>>>>> both connecting using the libpq installed with them?)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We have plenty of experience with clients reporting varying behavior
> >>>>>> from our 'applications', when it turns out they've 'hooked into' an
> >>>>>> unexpected version of the libpq client without, for example, SSL
> support
> >>>>>> built in, or Kerberos, or... This often happens after the client has
> >>>>>> unwittingly modified his environment in some way, sometimes after
> installing
> >>>>>> software.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> While the 'support libraries' issues above have no bearing on your
> >>>>>> case, of course, I certainly don't know enough to know that the
> different
> >>>>>> versions of libpq don't present xmlagg output differently!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The experts here will weigh in.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Lou Picciano
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>> From: Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sent: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:52:37 -0000 (UTC)
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [BUGS] Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > When I'm on the sql machine via localhost or 192.168.1.100 I'm
> >>>>>> > getting results.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I mean when I'm physically behind the machine and login via pgadmin
> >>>>>> using localhost or 192.168.1.100 then I get results.
> >>>>>> When I'm on another machine and login via pgadmin(192.168.1.100)
> then
> >>>>>> I get no results.
> >>>>>> Not sure what to think of this...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2013/2/19 Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> >Don't you have for example problems with the client application
> you
> >>>>>>> > use?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, with 1 table only. I'm not getting any results.
> >>>>>>> When I'm on the sql machine via localhost or 192.168.1.100 I'm
> >>>>>>> getting results.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2013/2/19 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Also no result with FROM __my_table LIMIT 1;
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm having correct results with PG 9.2 by using either xmlagg or
> >>>>>>>> xmlelement.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For example:
> >>>>>>>> postgres=# SELECT xmlelement(name el_name, id) FROM __table LIMIT
> 1;
> >>>>>>>>       xmlelement
> >>>>>>>> ----------------------
> >>>>>>>>  <el_name>1</el_name>
> >>>>>>>> Or:
> >>>>>>>> postgres=# SELECT xmlagg(xmlelement(name el_name, id)) FROM
> __table;
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>                   xmlagg
> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  <el_name>1</el_name><el_name>2</el_name>
> >>>>>>>> (1 row)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Btw, such simple tests would have failed on the buildfarm for
> >>>>>>>> regression xml.sql, so this looks to be an error in your
> environment.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Don't you have for example problems with the client application
> you
> >>>>>>>> use?
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Michael
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested xmlagg doesn't give a result 9.2.3