> Well, it does take longer to fsync a larger byte range to disk than a
> smaller byte range, in some cases. But it's generally more efficient
> to write one larger range than many smaller ranges, so you come out
> ahead on the whole.
Right, that does make sense.
So, the overhead of writing a lot of WAL buffers is mitigated because
one large write is better than lots of smaller rights?
Regards,
Atri
--
Regards,
Atri
l'apprenant
