Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+kDOe+1=LPzZM0CrcEWf6Ht+1vP49+nX3pZd1U1bo26gA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules  (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 12:32 PM Jacob Champion
<jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 12:06 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> > On 29/04/2024 21:43, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > > But if you're in that situation, what does the use of directonly give
> > > you over `sslnegotiation=direct`? You already know that servers
> > > support direct, so there's no additional performance penalty from the
> > > less strict mode.
> >
> > Well, by that argument we don't need requiredirect/directonly at all.
> > This goes back to whether it's a security feature or a performance feature.
>
> That's what I've been trying to argue, yeah. If it's not a security
> feature... why's it there?

Er, I should clarify this. I _want_ requiredirect. I just want it to
be a security feature.

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to clean out pg_init_privs grants