Re: Re: Add support to TLS 1.3 cipher suites and curves lists - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: Re: Add support to TLS 1.3 cipher suites and curves lists
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+k2qaJio+JkfKC2J+Shx8Fym-ifERhFLCR6mz7UXKxLVw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re:Re: Add support to TLS 1.3 cipher suites and curves lists  ("Erica Zhang" <ericazhangy2021@qq.com>)
Responses Re: Add support to TLS 1.3 cipher suites and curves lists
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 3:02 AM Erica Zhang <ericazhangy2021@qq.com> wrote:
>
> For some security consideration, we prefer to use TLS1.3 cipher suites in our product with some customization values
insteadof default value "HIGH:MEDIUM:+3DES:!aNULL". Moreover we prefer to set a group of ecdh keys instead of a single
value.

+1 for the curve list feature, at least. No opinions on the 1.3
ciphersuites half, yet.

I've added this patch to my planned review for the v18 cycle. Some
initial notes:

- Could you separate the two features into two patches? That would
make it easier for reviewers. (They can still share the same thread
and CF entry.)
- The "curve" APIs have been renamed "group" in newer OpenSSLs for a
while now, and we should probably use those if possible.
- I think parsing apart the groups list to check NIDs manually could
lead to false negatives. From a docs skim, 3.0 allows providers to add
their own group names, and 3.3 now supports question marks in the
string to allow graceful fallbacks.
- I originally thought it'd be better to just stop calling
SSL_set_tmp_ecdh() entirely by default, so we could use OpenSSL's
builtin list of groups. But that may have denial-of-service concerns
[1]?
- We should maybe look into SSL_CTX_config(), if we haven't discussed
that already on the list, but that's probably a bigger tangent and
doesn't need to be part of this patch.

Thanks,
--Jacob

[1] https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2022/10/21/tls-groups-configuration/index.html



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql OOM
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: WIP: parallel GiST index builds