Re: Would my postgresql 8.4.12 profit from doubling RAM? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Would my postgresql 8.4.12 profit from doubling RAM?
Date
Msg-id CAOR=d=3Jq-QG=iZBteBS_OQyhWxSMWyRrrp=eatHc1gtYG6z-w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Would my postgresql 8.4.12 profit from doubling RAM?  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Would my postgresql 8.4.12 profit from doubling RAM?  (Alexander Farber <alexander.farber@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:
> users, and currently work_mem is set to 1M (the default.)  If you
> increase that to 16M, that'd be max 1.6G of memory, which you have
> free anyway right now.

Self correction here.  Of course that's assuming 1 sort on average per
query.  My experience is that you generally use less than that. Except
when you don't.  :) If your typical query has 6 or 12 sorts in it,
your memory can run out fast.  But judging by your current free RAM,
I'm guessing it doesn't do that.  Only thorough testing can tell you
the sweet spot tho.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Would my postgresql 8.4.12 profit from doubling RAM?
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: String comparision in PostgreSQL