Hello,
I got a trouble report here:
https://github.com/heterodb/pg-strom/issues/636
It says that PG-Strom raised an error when the HAVING clause used
non-grouping-keys,
even though the vanilla PostgreSQL successfully processed the query.
SELECT MAX(c0) FROM t0 GROUP BY t0.c1 HAVING t0.c0<MIN(t0.c0);
However, I'm not certain what is the right behavior here.
The "c0" column does not appear in the GROUP BY clause, thus we cannot
know its individual
values after the group-by stage, right?
So, what does the "HAVING t0.c0<MIN(t0.c0)" evaluate here?
Best regards,
--
HeteroDB, Inc / The PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@heterodb.com>
