Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve access to parallel queryfrom procedural languages. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rafia Sabih
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve access to parallel queryfrom procedural languages.
Date
Msg-id CAOGQiiNLzuNHX-0Ac=2gSVnpGYOgYLsntgZ8VM9zxnd-8cBEgQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve access to parallel queryfrom procedural languages.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve access to parallel queryfrom procedural languages.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If it's just that they are relying on unsynchronized global variables,
> then it's sufficient to mark them parallel-restricted ('r').  Do we
> really need to go all the way to parallel-unsafe ('u')?
>
Done.

-- 
Regards,
Rafia Sabih
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com/
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: O(1) DSM handle operations
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: crashes due to setting max_parallel_workers=0