Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Beena Emerson
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Date
Msg-id CAOG9ApHyt1162NJmtbp26RFY0Nkx+HK5CyV9DOQaJSrBm=rQKQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:03 PM, David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>> We could do something similar here using a similar code structure.  Maybe,
>> add a ExecSetupPartitionRuntimePruning() in execPartition.c (mimicking
>> ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting), that accepts AppendState node.
>> Furthermore, it might be a good idea to have something similar to
>> ExecFindPartition(), say, ExecGetPartitions().  That is, we have new
>> functions for run-time pruning that are counterparts to corresponding
>> functions for tuple routing.
>
> Seems to me in this case we're better to build this structure during
> planning and save it with the plan so that it can be used over and
> over, rather than building it again and again each time the plan is
> executed. Likely a common use case for run-time pruning is when the
> plan is going to be used multiple times with different parameters, so
> we really don't want to repeat any work that we don't have to here.
>

I agree. It would be better to avoid building the structure during execution.
PFA the updated patch.

--

Beena Emerson

EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Beena Emerson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Basebackups reported as idle