Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Beena Emerson
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range
Date
Msg-id CAOG9ApGe3LX4+9s4qrwOSmhs5+OBE2tcQFT2ntSL5eZq9Mp+Og@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range  (Beena Emerson <memissemerson@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

PFA the updated patch which returns NULL instead of true when the
default partition has no constraints and also have modified the output
as discussed above.

This applies over v24 patch [1] of default list partition. I will
rebase over the next version when it is updated.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOgcT0OVwDu%2BbeChWb5R5s6rfKLCiWcZT5617hqu7T3GdA1hAw%40mail.gmail.com
-- 

Beena Emerson

EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions