Re: Why does VACUUM FULL pg_class sometimes wait for ShareLock on another transaction after getting AccessExclusiveLock on pg_class? - Mailing list pgsql-general

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 5:08 PM Marcin Barczynski <mbarczynski@starfishstorage.com> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 3:51 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-07-22 at 12:55 +0200, Marcin Barczynski wrote:
> > There was a long-running transaction consisting of two queries:
> >
> >     CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE abc AS SELECT * FROM def_view;
> >     INSERT INTO xyz_table SELECT * FROM abc;
> >    
> > When I ran VACUUM FULL pg_class, it waited for ShareLock on that transaction:
>
> There must have been something else using "pg_class", since the above
> won't take any permament locks on "pg_class", nor should it block VACUUM.


Thanks for your reply. I dugged a bit deeper, and it turned out that VACUUM FULL hung in heapam_index_build_range_scan.
It's PostgreSQL 13.3. Comments around heapam_handler.c:1482:

What's more, running VACUUM FULL pg_class sometimes causes a deadlock with transactions using temp tables. For example:

DETAIL:  Process 6703 waits for ShareLock on transaction 108850229; blocked by process 6591.
        Process 6591 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 1259 of database 16517; blocked by process 6703.
        Process 6703: VACUUM (FULL, VERBOSE, ANALYZE) pg_class
        Process 6591: SELECT * FROM stored_procedure()

Isn't it a bug?
Is there any way to safely run VACUUM FULL pg_class?
My workload involves lots of temp tables, and I need to get rid of the bloat regularly.

--
Regards,
Marcin Barczynski