Very slow 101-feeling design/query.. - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Wells Oliver
Subject Very slow 101-feeling design/query..
Date
Msg-id CAOC+FBWG-0BH_prvkbMTFuAQ37pr+Kx3S=V=krE1qkGhojXtJw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Very slow 101-feeling design/query..  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Re: Very slow 101-feeling design/query..  (Rui DeSousa <rui@crazybean.net>)
RE: Very slow 101-feeling design/query..  ("Michel SALAIS" <msalais@msym.fr>)
List pgsql-admin
This feels very 101 but I feel like it should be much faster:

A table "joints" with a PK of play_uuid, target_id, joint_seq, joint_timestamp.

"joints" is partitioned using RANGE on joint_timestamp for monthly partitions 1/1 - 2/1, 2-1 - 3/1, etc.

"joints" has an FK where play_uuid refers to table "plays" and column "play_uuid" where "play_uuid" is the PK.

"plays" additionally has an indexed column game_id.

"joints" has 1133,932,391 rows across 12 monthly partitions for 2021, and "plays has 585,627 rows. We made a view called "vw_joints" which just does:

SELECT * FROM joints JOIN plays USING (play_id);

Then doing:

SELECT DISTINCT game_id FROM vw_joints

Takes 35-45 minutes. Which seems nuts. We do this kind of design in a few different plays to normalize things, but it comes at the cost of these agonizingly slow (and seemingly dead simple) qeuries.

Is there any optimization to do here beyond flattening table and de-normalizing data? Is the partitioning causing a slowness here? I feel like partitioning is creating some difficulty...

Appreciate it.

--

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Haroldo Stenger
Date:
Subject: Re: security issues
Next
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: Very slow 101-feeling design/query..