On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:22 AM legrand legrand
<legrand_legrand@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> case avg_tps pct_diff
> >> 0 89 278 --
> >> 1 88 745 0,6%
> >> 2 88 282 1,1%
> >> 3 86 660 2,9%
> >>
> >> This means that even in this extrem test case, the worst degradation is less
> >> than 3%
> >> (this overhead can be removed using pg_stat_statements.track_planning guc)
>
> > Is the difference between 2 and 3 the extraneous pgss_store call to
> > always store the query text if planner hook doesn't have access to the
> > query text?
>
> Yes it is,
> but I agree it seems a big gap (1,8%) compared to the difference between 1 and 2 (0,5%).
> Maybe this is just mesure "noise" ...
Rebased patches attached.
