Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WALusage calculation patch) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WALusage calculation patch)
Date
Msg-id CAOBaU_axRXc14+hVxNO+y9hgzpwRb9K1nZCW48MOSsB6R8g9MA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WALusage calculation patch)  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Le dim. 12 avr. 2020 à 00:33, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 04:17:21PM +0100, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> Just to be sure I did a quick test with pg_stat_statements behavior using
> parallel/non-parallel CREATE INDEX and VACUUM, and unsurprisingly buffer usage
> doesn't reflect parallel workers' activity.
>
> I added an open for that, and adding Robert in Cc as 9da0cc352 is the first
> commit adding parallel maintenance.

I believe this is resolved for parallel vacuum in master and parallel create
index back to PG11.

indeed, I was about to take care of this too


thanks a lot! 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Add "-Wimplicit-fallthrough" to default flags (was Re: pgsql:Support FETCH FIRST WITH TIES)
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ls_tmpdir to show directories and shared filesets (andpg_ls_*)