On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 04:17:21PM +0100, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > Just to be sure I did a quick test with pg_stat_statements behavior using > parallel/non-parallel CREATE INDEX and VACUUM, and unsurprisingly buffer usage > doesn't reflect parallel workers' activity. > > I added an open for that, and adding Robert in Cc as 9da0cc352 is the first > commit adding parallel maintenance.
I believe this is resolved for parallel vacuum in master and parallel create index back to PG11.