Re: Hook for extensible parsing. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Hook for extensible parsing.
Date
Msg-id CAOBaU_aaXh7Ck+tuwyQAsJwSeMNmTC=+w9BvbfFYmR8RU-cuSQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hook for extensible parsing.  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:23 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:57 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > > The requirement is that the parser can't leak any
> > > node that the rest of the system doesn't know about, but you can do
> > > what you want inside the parser.
> >
> > That's not what the patch actually does, though.  It only replaces
> > the grammar, not semantic analysis.  So you couldn't associate the
> > (+)-decorated WHERE clause with the appropriate join.  (And no,
> > I will not accept that it's okay to perform catalog lookups in
> > the grammar to get around that.  See comment at the head of gram.y.)
>
> I never said that one should do catalog lookup for that?  What I said
> is that you can do a specific semantic analysis pass in the hook if
> you know that you can have extensible nodes in your parsetree, and you
> can do that with that hook unless I'm missing something?

Ah, now that I think more about it I think that you're talking about
unqualified fields?  I was naively assuming that those wouldn't be
allowed by oracle, but I guess that wishful thinking.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file
Next
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting ERROR "subplan "SubPlan 1" was not initialized" in EXISTS subplan when using for list partition.