Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
Date
Msg-id CAOBaU_ZMKVs_1jadL-JKbtafiC89yc0x+3ToDyQavHvLqrucjg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:00 PM Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> So it should be ok if the temporary undo is managed and discarded by
> individual backends. Patch 0005 of the new series tries to do that.

The cfbot reports that at least the 001 patch doesn't apply anymore:
http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_36_3228.log
> === applying patch ./undo-20211125/0001-Add-SmgrId-to-smgropen-and-BufferTag.patch
> [...]
> patching file src/bin/pg_waldump/pg_waldump.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 480 (offset 17 lines).
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 500.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 531.
> 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/bin/pg_waldump/pg_waldump.c.rej

Could you send a rebased version?  In the meantime I'll switch the cf
entry to Waiting on Author.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Borisov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: DELETE CASCADE