Re: pg_stat_statements: more test coverage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements: more test coverage
Date
Msg-id CAOBaU_ZJC=Wxtocz3KAiOWKFSqvuNkvb_A86mZccqd3seAODiQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements: more test coverage  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_statements: more test coverage
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 2:28 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 08:39:47PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Ok, I have committed these two patches.
>
> Please note that the buildfarm has turned red, as in:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stagxe_log.pl?nm=pipit&dt=2023-12-31%2001%3A12%3A22&stg=misc-check
>
> pg_stat_statements's regression.diffs holds more details:
> SELECT query FROM pg_stat_statements WHERE query LIKE '%t001%' OR query LIKE '%t098%' ORDER BY query;
>          query
>  --------------------
> - select * from t001
>   select * from t098
> -(2 rows)
> +(1 row)

That's surprising.  I wanted to see if there was any specific
configuration but I get a 403.  I'm wondering if this is only due to
other tests being run concurrently evicting an entry earlier than
planned.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Paul Jungwirth
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup has an accidentaly separated help message