Re: Have we tried to treat CTE as SubQuery in planner? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Have we tried to treat CTE as SubQuery in planner?
Date
Msg-id CAOBaU_YTCkze7qJSZXWzzrWXbJRez1Qgf7wgt8yik0kj1rThMw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Have we tried to treat CTE as SubQuery in planner?  (Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 2:04 PM Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> Take the following example:
>
> insert into cte1  select i, i from generate_series(1, 1000000)i;
> create index on cte1(a);
>
> explain
> with cte1 as  (select * from cte1)
> select * from c where a = 1;
>
> It needs to do seq scan on the above format, however it is pretty
> quick if we change the query to
> select * from (select * from cte1) c where a = 1;
>
> I know how we treat cte and subqueries differently currently,
> I just don't know why we can't treat cte as a subquery, so lots of
> subquery related technology can apply to it.  Do we have any
> discussion about this?

See https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=608b167f9f9c4553c35bb1ec0eab9ddae643989b



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Have we tried to treat CTE as SubQuery in planner?
Next
From: Jesse Zhang
Date:
Subject: Re: Have we tried to treat CTE as SubQuery in planner?