On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:00 AM imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com
<imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Actually I also don't have strong opinion but I thought someone would complain about renaming of those columns and
alsosome tools like monitoring which use those columns will not work. If we use {total, min, max, mean, stddev}_time,
someonemight mistakenly understand {total, min, max, mean, stddev}_time mean {total, min, max, mean, stddev} of
planningand execution.
> If I need to choose {total, min, max, mean, stddev}_time or {total, min, max, mean, stddev}_exec_time, I choose
formerone because choosing best name is not worth destructing the existing scripts or tools.
We could definitely keep (plan|exec)_time for the SRF, and have the
{total, min, max, mean, stddev}_time created by the view to be a sum
of planning + execution for each counter, and it doesn't sound like a
bad idea if having even more columns in the view is not an issue.
