Re: [DOCS] Correction - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Gokhan Demir
Subject Re: [DOCS] Correction
Date
Msg-id CAOBOzNrPGOCcUtE8cNijysWj2DNb_v8iUYgnMi58awg=nrmEJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Correction  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Hi Tom,

Then I guess I will need to read that part of the chapter again.
Many thanks for the clarification. 

Gokhan.

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
demirgokhan@gmail.com writes:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/datatype-json.html
> Description:

> Shouldn&#39;t be below statement:

> &quot;Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries with the
> @&gt; operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator
> class jsonb_ops.&quot;

> corrected to:

> &quot;Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries with the ?
> operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator
> class jsonb_ops.&quot;

Uh, no, I don't think so:

regression=# select oid from pg_opfamily where opfname = 'jsonb_path_ops';
 oid
------
 4037
(1 row)

regression=# select amopopr::regoperator from pg_amop where amopfamily = 4037;
     amopopr
-----------------
 @>(jsonb,jsonb)
(1 row)

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Migration to PGLister - After
Next
From: "葛西 裕昭(システム開発部-開発9チーム CLINKS)"
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQLドキュメントバグ報告_9.3. 算術関数と演算子