Re: pgAdmin4: Test result enhancement patch - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

Hi Navnath 

I have run the updated patch. It is working fine with Python 2.7 but I am facing following error with Python 3.5, can you please look into it:

======================================================================

ERROR: runTest (pgadmin.feature_tests.connect_to_server_feature_test.ConnectsToServerFeatureTest)

Test database connection which can be created from the UI

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_utils/base_feature_test.py", line 33, in setUp

    self.page.reset_layout()

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 33, in reset_layout

    self.click_modal_ok()

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 38, in click_modal_ok

    self.click_element(self.find_by_xpath("//button[contains(.,'OK')]"))

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 71, in find_by_xpath

    return self.wait_for_element(lambda driver: driver.find_element_by_xpath(xpath))

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 128, in wait_for_element

    return self._wait_for("element to exist", element_if_it_exists)

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 162, in _wait_for

    "Timed out waiting for " + waiting_for_message)

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/Workspace/lib/python3.5/site-packages/selenium/webdriver/support/wait.py", line 80, in until

    raise TimeoutException(message, screen, stacktrace)

selenium.common.exceptions.TimeoutException: Message: Timed out waiting for element to exist

======================================================================

ERROR: runTest (pgadmin.feature_tests.table_ddl_feature_test.TableDdlFeatureTest)

Test scenarios for acceptance tests

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_utils/base_feature_test.py", line 33, in setUp

    self.page.reset_layout()

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 31, in reset_layout

    self.click_element(self.find_by_partial_link_text("File"))

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 90, in click_element

    return self._wait_for("clicking the element not to throw an exception", click_succeeded)

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 162, in _wait_for

    "Timed out waiting for " + waiting_for_message)

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/Workspace/lib/python3.5/site-packages/selenium/webdriver/support/wait.py", line 80, in until

    raise TimeoutException(message, screen, stacktrace)

selenium.common.exceptions.TimeoutException: Message: Timed out waiting for clicking the element not to throw an exception

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ran 153 tests in 45.493s

FAILED (errors=2, skipped=16)

======================================================================

Test Result Summary

======================================================================

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "runtests.py", line 354, in <module>

    skipped_cases)

  File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/python_test_utils/test_utils.py", line 442, in get_scenario_name

    key, value = case_name_dict.items()[0]

TypeError: 'dict_items' object does not support indexing

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Navnath Gadakh <navnath.gadakh@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

Hi Dave,

     Please find the revised patch for test result enhancement.

What's in the patch:

1. The test result summary will store in JSON file.

2. Removed some redundant code from regression/test_utils.py

3. Added the scenario names for feature tests.

4. To print test scenario names in failed and skipped test cases, I override apply_scenario() function in regression/test_utils.py

I have also attached the sample JSON file with the test result as per your suggestions.

Thanks!

 

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Navnath Gadakh

<navnath.gadakh@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Navnath Gadakh
>> <navnath.gadakh@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> > Hello Dave,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Navnath Gadakh
>> >> <navnath.gadakh@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> When running with the patch:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1) The browser isn't closed, and the script never exits - it just
>> >> >> sits
>> >> >> indefinitely at:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> =====
>> >> >> Please check output in file:
>> >> >> /Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/regression/regression.log
>> >> >>
>> >> >> make: *** [check] Error 1
>> >> >> =====
>> >> >>
>> >> >> without returning to a shell prompt. The browser exits when I hit
>> >> >> Ctrl+C.
>> >>
>> >> The above is still a problem. In fact, not only do I have to hit
>> >> Ctrl+C, but then the browser prompts me to check I really do want to
>> >> exit.
>> >>
>> >> There's also another problem that just showed up. I got the following
>> >> failure on PG 9.4 (due to a known intermittent bug that Ashesh and
>> >> Tira@Pivotal are working on). Note how it's not reported in the
>> >> summary (or the JSON output):
>> >
>> >
>> > I found the issue, In the feature tests we need to add a scenario name
>> > for
>> > each test case. the purpose of this patch is to print the failed/skipped
>> > test class name with the scenario name like:
>> >
>> > 152 tests passed
>> >
>> > 1 test failed:
>> >
>> >          LoginRoleGetTestCase (Check Role Node)
>> >
>> > 16 tests skipped:
>> >
>> > SynonymGetTestCase (Fetch synonym Node URL)
>> >
>> > But our in-built test framework does not provide that scenario name with
>> > failed/skipped test case that's why I override apply_scenario()
>> > function.
>> >
>> > def apply_scenario(scenario, test):
>> >
>> >        name, parameters = scenario
>> >
>> >       parameters["scenario_name"] = name
>> >
>> > While printing the result, I have checked the if 'scenario_name' in test
>> > as
>> > we need to print scenario name in test summary as well as in JSON file.
>> >
>> > I can do it without scenario name but for better understanding which
>> > test
>> > scenario is failed it's good to add a scenario name with each test case.
>>
>> OK.
>>
>> > See this is how test cases looks like while printing on console
>> >
>> >  API:
>> >
>> > runTest
>> >
>> > (pgadmin.browser.server_groups.servers.databases.schemas.types.tests.test_types_put.TypesUpdateTestCase)
>> >
>> > Update type under schema node ... ok
>> >
>> >  Feature tests:
>> >
>> > runTest
>> >
>> > (pgadmin.utils.tests.test_versioned_template_loader.TestVersionedTemplateLoader)
>> > ... ok
>> >
>> > No scenario name in feature tests.
>> >
>>
>> OK, is that easy to fix while you're at it?
>
>
> I have two solutions-
>
> 1. Need a little hack to skip scenario/test name if that does not exist, but
> that's not the best idea.
>
> 2. Owner of feature tests should add scenario/test name to each feature
> test. In the summary also we will know for which scenario test is failing or
> skipping.
> This is ideal and long term solution and I prefer it.

Agreed - and as there are only 2 feature tests, you should be able to
fix them up pretty quickly :-p

Once code is in the repo, it's "ours", meaning the entire communities.
I wouldn't expect us to ping all issues back to Pivotal - we're one
team on this.

Thanks!

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

--

Regards,

Navnath Gadakh

EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers

--

Akshay Joshi

Principal Software Engineer 

Phone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246