On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 9:09 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Good point. I would be on board with a \close_prepared then, if
> that's the consensus we reach, without touching at \bind_named. We
> still have time to decide on the name until the release, just let's
> make sure to not do a rename multiple times.
True. That would also allow adding a \close_cursor meta-command
without name ambiguity.
Since the consensus seems to lean toward \close_prepared, I've
prepared the patch to rename the command. I haven't modified the
traduction files though, I think they're updated through a different
process?