Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions10.5 and 11.0 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Sanyo Moura
Subject Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions10.5 and 11.0
Date
Msg-id CAO698qZdySrj1ymXS9EysHyiYByT8D2ZRURwiiBSRL2jzTnrFQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions10.5 and 11.0  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Thanks a lot Justin,

At this moment I can not help you with what you asked for, but tomorrow morning I will send other information.
I believe Postgres 11.1 is somehow taking a lot of planning time when analyzing which partitions are needed in execution.

Sanyo

Em ter, 27 de nov de 2018 às 22:44, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:17 AM Sanyo Moura <sanyo.moura@tatic.net> wrote:
>>> I'm running performance tests for my application at version 11.1 and
>>> encountered queries with high planning time compared to the same planning,
>>> running at versions 10.5 and 11.0.

I was able to reproduce this behavior.

For my version of the query:

On PG10.6
| Result  (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=24)
|   One-Time Filter: false
|Time: 408.335 ms

On PG11.1
| Result  (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=24)
|   One-Time Filter: false
|Time: 37487.364 ms (00:37.487)

Perf shows me:
  47.83%  postmaster  postgres            [.] bms_overlap
  45.30%  postmaster  postgres            [.] add_child_rel_equivalences
   1.26%  postmaster  postgres            [.] generate_join_implied_equalities_for_ecs

CREATE TABLE producto (pluid int unique);
CREATE TABLE almacen (loccd int unique);
CREATE TABLE precio(fecha timestamp, pluid int, loccd int, plusalesprice int) PARTITION BY RANGE (fecha);
SELECT 'CREATE TABLE public.precio_'||i||' PARTITION OF public.precio (PRIMARY KEY (fecha, pluid, loccd), CONSTRAINT precio_20170301_almacen_fk FOREIGN KEY (loccd) REFERENCES public.almacen (loccd) MATCH SIMPLE ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT precio_20170301_producto_fk FOREIGN KEY (pluid) REFERENCES public.producto (pluid) MATCH SIMPLE ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION) FOR VALUES FROM ('''||a||''')TO('''||b||''') TABLESPACE pg_default' FROM (SELECT '1990-01-01'::timestamp+(i||'days')::interval a, '1990-01-02'::timestamp+(i||'days')::interval b, i FROM generate_series(1,999) i)x;

\gexec
\timing
explain SELECT l_variacao.fecha, l_variacao.loccd , l_variacao.pant , l_variacao.patual , max_variacao.var_max FROM (SELECT p.fecha, p.loccd, p.plusalesprice patual, da.plusalesprice pant, abs(p.plusalesprice - da.plusalesprice) as var from precio p, (SELECT p.fecha, p.plusalesprice, p.loccd from precio p WHERE p.fecha between '2017-03-01' and '2017-03-02' and p.pluid = 2) da WHERE p.fecha between '2017-03-01' and '2017-03-02' and p.pluid = 2 and p.loccd = da.loccd and p.fecha = da.fecha) l_variacao, (SELECT max(abs(p.plusalesprice - da.plusalesprice)) as var_max from precio p, (SELECT p.fecha, p.plusalesprice, p.loccd from precio p WHERE p.fecha between '2017-03-01' and '2017-03-02' and p.pluid = 2) da WHERE p.fecha between '2017-03-01' and '2017-03-02' and p.pluid = 2 and p.loccd = da.loccd and p.fecha = da.fecha) max_variacao WHERE max_variacao.var_max = l_variacao.var;

Since I don't know the original table definitions, I removed two "+1" from the
given sql to avoid: "ERROR:  operator does not exist: timestamp without time zone + integer"

Justin

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions10.5 and 11.0
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions10.5 and 11.0