Re: PgBackRest Full backup and N/W reliability - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: PgBackRest Full backup and N/W reliability
Date
Msg-id CANzqJaCZiCET_sd2RDxyMj2TjDTKvYU3Mm9ixymH1fqWRK4__Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PgBackRest Full backup and N/W reliability  (KK CHN <kkchn.in@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 12:08 PM KK CHN <kkchn.in@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 6:54 PM Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 2:21 AM KK CHN <kkchn.in@gmail.com> wrote:
I am doing a full backup  using PgBackRest from a production server to Reposerver.  
... 
If so, does the backup process start  again from  scratch ?   or it resumes from  where the backup process is stopped   ? 

It resumes. You will see a message like this:

WARN: resumable backup 20240829-091727F of same type exists -- invalid files will be removed then the backup will resume

Any suggestions much appreciated

Boost your process-max as high as you are able to speed up your backup time.


what will be the ideal process-max number to use ? 

We can't answer that.  It depends on what else your PG and PgBackRest servers are doing when "pgbackrest backup" runs.
 
Once I update the process-max param in pgbackrest.conf ,  do I need to stop and  start the pgback rest ? 

Or just editing the pgbackrest.conf on the fly will reflect the increased process-max  numbers advantage ?   

"pgbackrest backup" reads the config file when it starts.
 
Is there a limit for proces max. setting ?

I think you need managed DBA services.

--
Death to America, and butter sauce.
Iraq lobster!

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: KK CHN
Date:
Subject: PgBackRest Ideal N/W need to provisioned ?
Next
From: Rumpi Gravenstein
Date:
Subject: Analytic Function Bug