Re: Best Tool for PostgreSQL Auditing and Storing Audit Logs Separately - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Best Tool for PostgreSQL Auditing and Storing Audit Logs Separately
Date
Msg-id CANzqJaCTCJHZtiL6Y48Bp7si+MasnrV95+y0jgGxtm4yMH83gA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Best Tool for PostgreSQL Auditing and Storing Audit Logs Separately  (Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>)
Responses Re: Best Tool for PostgreSQL Auditing and Storing Audit Logs Separately
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 3:42 PM Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 02:43:59PM -0400, Ron Johnson wrote:
> You'll have to bring that up with the PgAudit maintainer.  Note, though,
> that the purpose of PgAudit is not "recreate the database from audit logs";
> it's "what Auditors care about".  In my experience, auditors do not care
> about COMMIT and ROLLBACK statements.

I would care about what happened.  To know what happened I'd have to see
either only audit logs for committed transactions, or also see the
COMMIT and ROLLBACK statements.

Decode the logical replication stream?

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Nico Williams
Date:
Subject: Re: Best Tool for PostgreSQL Auditing and Storing Audit Logs Separately
Next
From: Nico Williams
Date:
Subject: Re: Best Tool for PostgreSQL Auditing and Storing Audit Logs Separately