Re: PostgreSQL historical database - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: PostgreSQL historical database
Date
Msg-id CANzqJaBd6ij80vJVZmDzVPGHdin=5F08bxjFeNjR93ocw9uzhQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL historical database  (Keith Fiske <keith.fiske@crunchydata.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 1:15 PM Keith Fiske <keith.fiske@crunchydata.com> wrote:
[snip] 
I would first recommend looking into partitioning for managing data retention like this. As Ron says, you'll want to look into the performance implications of this, but it allows for the most efficient method of removing old data from PostgreSQL and is typically worth the overhead costs. Otherwise you're dealing with potentially expensive deletion operations and managing bloat vs just detaching/dropping a table.
 
Am I the only person to have ever gotten good DELETE performance from Postgresql?

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: RE: PostgreSQL historical database
Next
From: Rui DeSousa
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL historical database