Re: pg_upgrade: can I use same binary for old & new? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: pg_upgrade: can I use same binary for old & new?
Date
Msg-id CANzqJaBPjHBufQtcmHopcMNpR7VymJZZQXyijifD45vVrxcEog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade: can I use same binary for old & new?  (pf@pfortin.com)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, Jul 5, 2025 at 2:24 PM <pf@pfortin.com> wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 11:11:32 -0700 Adrian Klaver wrote:

>On 7/5/25 09:52, Pierre Fortin wrote:

>> Wanting to upgrade from:
>> PostgreSQL 15.13 on x86_64-mageia-linux-gnu,
>> compiled by gcc (Mageia 15.1.0-1.mga10) 15.1.0, 64-bit
>> to:
>> PG 17.5
>>
>> Way back, I was able to use -k|--link option on pg_upgrade (PG13 to PG15);
>> but since then:
>>
>> - my DB has grown to over 8TB 
>
>How did you measure above?

# du -sb /var/lib/pgsql/data
8227910662297   /var/lib/pgsql/data

>> - even with ~70TB, I don't have enough contiguous disk space to
>>    dump/restore 
>
>What was the pg_dump command?

Didn't try given:
$ df /mnt/db
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdh1        17T   13T  3.0T  82% /mnt/db

I suppose I could dump each of the 1408 objects to various available
drives; but given my previous experience with PG13 to PG15 using --link
which took seconds; I'm hoping to avoid wasting time (at my age, hours
matter).

There's something you're not telling us.  The whole point of "pg_upgrade --link" is an in-place upgrade. It might use a few extra GB of disk space for when it backs up the PG15 schema and restores it to PG17.  Thus, why are you complaining about running out of disk space?

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: can I use same binary for old & new?
Next
From: Pierre Fortin
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: can I use same binary for old & new?