Re: Partitioning and ORM tools - Mailing list pgsql-general
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:20 PM, CS DBA <cs_dba@consistentstate.com> wrote:
On 03/22/2016 03:18 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:That was our first suggestion, they don;t want to make any app changes
On 03/22/2016 03:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:On 03/22/2016 01:50 PM, CS DBA wrote:I would think the ORM (as yet undefined) would want to think in terms of the parent table and not know about the physical schema details.Understood, was just wondering if there is a way to cause the child
table insert results to be returned to the ORM/Application instead of
the master/base table insert
Insert into the child table directly based on the partition rules.
JD
Can the client not be written to check only for errors vs checking for non-zero inserts?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I highly suspect this is a problem with trigger function design, constraint conflict or a bad insert statement, but since no details have been provided, it cannot be resolved.
IOW, all they said was "It don't work", but they have not provided proof.
--
Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
pgsql-general by date: