Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michail Nikolaev
Subject Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Date
Msg-id CANtu0ogBOtd9ravu1CUbuZWgq6qvn1rny38PGKDPk9zzQPH8_A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements  (Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello.

I did the POC (1) of the method described in the previous email, and it looks promising.

It doesn't block the VACUUM, indexes are built about 30% faster (22 mins vs 15 mins). Additional index is lightweight and does not produce any WAL.

I'll continue the more stress testing for a while. Also, I need to restructure the commits (my path was no direct) into some meaningful and reviewable patches.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: 001_rep_changes.pl fails due to publisher stuck on shutdown
Next
From: Masahiro Ikeda
Date:
Subject: Doc: fix a description regarding WAL summarizer on glossary page