Home > mailing lists

Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	Yuriy Zhuravlev
Subject	Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
Date	April 20, 2018 06:30:21
Msg-id	CANiD2e_aN7-ps-darPMJ5BpUyCj7Sj3OjEh8EJp3uCFUKFqsBg@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List	pgsql-hackers

My gut reaction to Catalin's list is that requiring C+11 is a pretty
darn high bar to clear for older platforms.

It's only for latest version and we can support version 3.9 with C++98 I think at least 5 years.

3.9.6 was realease in November 10, 2017 .

That's a pretty big shift from the project's traditional
mindset.

Sure, but I think time to time it should be happen.

But to me it's a significant minus that we'd have to set against whatever
pluses are claimed for a move.

It's obvious minuses but I still can't understand your position on this question.

Regards

From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date: 20 April 2018, 06:14:14
Subject: Re: Built-in connection pooling

From: Amit Langote
Date: 20 April 2018, 06:48:50
Subject: Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions