Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yuriy Zhuravlev
Subject Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
Date
Msg-id CANiD2e9Ss0y75V7uXmJ=2m6gvqtTOvg8+vPo3a6D1Min5D-WQw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers


2018-05-03 9:32 GMT+09:00 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>:
On 2018-05-03 09:29:32 +0900, Yuriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> >
> > I don't think that unsubstantiated hyperbole is the right way to
> > approach the task of convincing the community to adopt the approach
> > you prefer.
>
>
> It's not a hyperbole it's fact and I even talked about it on conference.
> You should just compare all my cmake files with Makefile+.in+.m4 (and msvc
> folder) it was significant reduce code to maintain.
> Anyway all my intention in this field it's to reduce pain and reduce suppor
> time for build system.
> Curren state:
>
> cat `find ./ | grep '\.in\|\.m4\|Makefile\|\/msvc\/'` | wc
>  22942   76111  702163
>
> cat `find ./ | grep 'CMakeLists\|\.cmake'` | wc
>   9160   16604  278061

Given that you don't have feature parity this just seems like trolling.

I have. I have some lacks with .po generation and documentation but all! other features same, I even can run tap tests. 
Look into my task issue list https://github.com/stalkerg/postgres_cmake/issues it's can increase number of lines maximum on 10%. 
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?