Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Wayne E. Seguin
Subject Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3
Date
Msg-id CANf8RLv=UsHu+0bDS-fLJWhZATeE+hf8rW7DyUF2vbfWuTO_Vg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-general
Thank you everyone for your replies, the thoughts and context are greatly appreciated!

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 13 August 2015 at 23:52, Wayne E. Seguin <wayneeseguin@gmail.com> wrote:

> The context of this is using BDR to implement a HA solution where we  have
> one node getting all connections at a time, if the node fails we move all
> connections to another node. (eg. only one node gets all connections at any
> given time).

This sounds like a job better suited to a normal active/standby
configuration with regular built-in streaming replication. Use a tool
like repmgr to manage failover and a proxy like pgbouncer to redirect
traffic.

There's no reason to use async multi-master replication when simple
single-master replication will do just as well.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



--

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Zdeněk Bělehrádek
Date:
Subject: Re: How to EXPLAIN a trigger function
Next
From: Jony Cohen
Date:
Subject: Re: First-class Polymorphic joins?