Thiago Nunes <thiagotnunes@gmail.com> writes: > I think your solution deals with all the cases, but I would like to point > out how I fixed it locally. I recalculated Num.zero_end after this line ( > https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_15_2/src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c#L6716 > ): > ``` > Num.zero_end = Num.pre + Num.post; > ``` Hmm ... that seems a bit ad-hoc, because as far as I understand this code, zero_end is supposed to track where is the last '0' format character. That shouldn't change just because we decided that the data value overflowed. regards, tom lane
pgsql-bugs by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных