Re: support for MERGE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: support for MERGE
Date
Msg-id CANbhV-H+AfAuL9mOa0mCvBTPv7HjEV0fjizZr2MZ0uE0zm=DhA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: support for MERGE  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: support for MERGE  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: support for MERGE  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 1:44 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> 5) WHEN AND
>
> I admit the "WHEN AND" conditions sounds a bit cryptic - it took me a
> while to realize what this refers to. Is that a term established by SQL
> Standard, or something we invented?

As Vik notes, this refers to the WHEN [NOT] MATCHED AND when-and-clause
so in that case I was referring to the "when-and_clause" portion.
Yes, that is part of the standard.

> 6) walsender.c
>
> Huh, why does this patch touch this at all?

Nothing I added, IIRC, nor am I aware of why that would exist.

> 7) rewriteHandler.c
>
> I see MERGE "doesn't support" rewrite rules in the sense that it simply
> ignores them. Shouldn't it error-out instead? Seems like a foot-gun to
> me, because people won't realize this limitation and may not notice
> their rules don't fire.

Simply ignoring rules is consistent with COPY, that was the only
reason for that choice. It could certainly throw an error instead.

> 8) varlena.c
>
> Again, why are these changes to length checks in a MERGE patch?

Nothing I added, IIRC, nor am I aware of why that would exist.

> 9) parsenodes.h
>
> Should we rename mergeTarget_relation to mergeTargetRelation? The
> current name seems like a mix between two naming schemes.

+1

We've had code from 4-5 people in the patch now, so I will re-review
myself to see if I can shed light on anything.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Yet another fast GiST build