On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 06:54, Avi Weinberg <AviW@gilat.com> wrote:
> I have a publisher with around 30 tables. I have two types of subscribers. Both types needs 25 "common" tables from
thepublisher plus 2-3 specific tables for each type of subscriber.
>
> For maintenance and monitoring reasons it is better for me to have both subscribers point to the same publisher but
"skip/ignore"2-3 tables that are not needed for them. If this is not possible, I will be forced to create 2
publishers.
>
> Any idea hot to ignore tables from publisher?
That's not the way the APIs are defined.
Creating 2 publications should not be a problem.
Specifying the metadata for your situation would be about the same
complexity in all cases.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
