Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name
Date
Msg-id CANbhV-E5N6x9p0pgxG7bZziycOBP5pKyk0GqvRu5mbWpLLcuDg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 15:03, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > Ah, one theory is that the libpq_pipeline program is getting linked to
> > an installed version of libpq that doesn't contain the fixes.  Maybe you
> > can do `ldd /path/to/libpq_pipeline` and see which copy of libpq.so it
> > is picking up?
>
> That's pronounced "otool -L" on macOS.  But in any case, it's going
> to point at the installation directory.  One of the moving parts here
> is that "make check" will try to override the rpath that otool tells
> you about to make test programs use the libpq.dylib from the build tree.
> I say "try" because if you've got SIP enabled (see what "csrutil status"
> tells you), it will fail to do so and the installed libpq will be used.
> Maybe that's old.
>
> Standard recommendation on macOS with SIP on is to always do "make
> install" before "make check".

Thanks, will investigate.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Log details for client certificate failures
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name