Re: stale WAL files? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rene Romero Benavides
Subject Re: stale WAL files?
Date
Msg-id CANaGW08JENvLoxKJ1LPUtkZ_p1A8-XzdKy=Oq0FSe1Ve+AaV0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: stale WAL files?  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: stale WAL files?  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
Re: stale WAL files?  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general


On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 1:05 PM Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:


On Apr 1, 2019, at 9:20 PM, Rene Romero Benavides <rene.romero.b@gmail.com> wrote:


On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 6:30 PM Rene Romero Benavides <rene.romero.b@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:03 PM Gmail <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:


> On Mar 30, 2019, at 10:54 AM, Gmail <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>> On Mar 29, 2019, at 6:58 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:53:16AM -0600, Rob Sargent wrote:
>>> This is pg10 so it's pg_wal.  ls -ltr
>>>
>>>
>>> -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 16:33
>>> 0000000100000CEA000000B1
>>> -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 16:33
>>> 0000000100000CEA000000B2
>>>
>>> ... 217 more on through to ...
>>>
>>> -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 17:01
>>> 0000000100000CEA000000E8
>>> -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 17:01
>>> 0000000100000CEA000000E9
>>> -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 28 09:46
>>> 0000000100000CEA0000000E
> I’m now down to 208 Mar 16 WAL files so they are being processed (at least deleted).  I’ve taken a snapshot of the pg_wal dir such that I can see which files get processed. It’s none of the files I’ve listed previously

Two more have been cleaned up.  001C and 001D generated at 16:38 Mar 16



Please share your complete postgresql.conf file and the results from this query: 
SELECT * FROM pg_settings;
has someone in the past configured wal archiving?
You've ran out of disk space as this log message you shared states:
No space left on device
what's the output of df -h

--
El genio es 1% inspiración y 99% transpiración.
Thomas Alva Edison
http://pglearn.blogspot.mx/


BTW , how spread apart are checkpoints happening? do you have stats on that? maybe they're too spread apart and that's why WAL files cannot be recycled rapidly enough?  
--
El genio es 1% inspiración y 99% transpiración.
Thomas Alva Edison
http://pglearn.blogspot.mx/

two attempts (one in-line, one with attachement) at sending postgresql.conf and pg_settings report have been sent to a moderator.



As per your configuration :
max_wal_size = 50GB
this seems to be the cause for the WAL files piling up.

this has been declared twice, the last one is taking effect.
--
El genio es 1% inspiración y 99% transpiración.
Thomas Alva Edison
http://pglearn.blogspot.mx/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: Recommendation to run vacuum FULL in parallel
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Seeded Replication