Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Flavius Anton
Subject Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres
Date
Msg-id CANXdjjafe4==2Q2d1Fbp0MBJwHYw5M2wq6=DF=4Bvsub-jQS=g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres  (Flavius Anton <f.v.anton@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres  (Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@8kdata.com>)
Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Flavius Anton <f.v.anton@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Flavius Anton <f.v.anton@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd love to talk more about this.
>>
>> I thought quite a bit about this a few years ago but never really
>> picked up it to work on.

Any other thoughts on this? My guess is that it might be an important
addition to Postgres that can attract even more users, but I am not
sure if there's enough interest from the community. If I want to pick
this task, how should I move forward? Do I need to write a design
document or similar or should I come up with a patch that implements a
draft prototype? I am new to this community and don't know the code
yet, so I'd appreciate some guidance from an older, more experienced
member.

Thanks.

--
Flavius



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking behavior of force_parallel_mode = regress
Next
From: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
Date:
Subject: Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres