On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 7:51 PM Ants Aasma <ants.aasma@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> It didn't calculate the same result because the if (mask) condition
> was incorrect. Changed it to if (chunk & 0xFF) and removed the right
> shift from the mask.
Yes, you're quite right.
> It seems to be half a nanosecond faster, but as I
> don't have a machine set up for microbenchmarking it's quite close to
> measurement noise.
With my "throughput-ush" test, they look good:
pgbench -n -T 20 -f bench_cstr_aligned.sql -M prepared | grep latency
master:
latency average = 490.722 ms
(Ants Aantsma) v-17 0001:
latency average = 385.263 ms
v17 0001+0002:
latency average = 339.506 ms
> I didn't post the harness as it's currently so messy to be near
> useless to others. But if you'd like to play around, I can tidy it up
> a bit and post it.
I'd be curious, thanks.
