Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU again
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZavwgVepVY1vuNFyi=eSmNO-uR=Tffmw0_wJ7Xiz0k3+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU again
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 10:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:

> >> +/* restore so that extensions can include the C++ APIs */
> >> +#undef U_SHOW_CPLUSPLUS_API
>
> > Does the #undef U_SHOW_CPLUSPLUS_API thing actually work, given that ucol.h
> > presumably won't be included again due to #ifdef protection?
>
> Good point.  If a .cpp file wants access to the C++ APIs, it'd have
> to include <unicode/ucol.h> before not after including pg_locale.h.
> That should work AFAICS, but this #undef doesn't help.

I see that now. If extensions follow the practice of including system
headers before Postgres headers, it should be fine. I've attached v2
which removes the useless #undef and drafts an explanatory commit
message.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid circular header file dependency