Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZai=YQNV_VY6tt=pL2RquU2NNr2WQbuj3G8hYeJBeGyyA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 8:52 AM Anton A. Melnikov
<a.melnikov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 22.01.2025 11:37, John Naylor wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 4:50 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> It would be a lot more readable to revert the offending commit
> >> instead, since its predecessor had a much simpler bytewise loop.
>
> Agreed that reverting seems as a preferable way, and here's why.

This is done -- thanks for the report, and for testing.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation