Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZZ77LO_Z-Qw=JVYkwDHK8__Fm2NgM0ntC7DKCQ0fvsNng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 8:31 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > During trying this idea, I realized that there is a visibility problem
> > in the radix tree template
>
> If it's broken even without the embedding I'll look into this (I don't
> know if this configuration has ever been tested). I think a good test
> is putting the shared tid tree in it's own translation unit, to see if
> anything needs to be fixed. I'll go try that.

Here's a quick test that this works. The only thing that really needed
fixing in the template was failure to un-define one symbol. The rest
was just moving some things around.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Simplify documentation related to Windows builds
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: System username in pg_stat_activity