Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mike Blackwell
Subject Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Date
Msg-id CANPAkguB9G1BEk=TR6XkzZ5Hnm9iEoToF+HVqPRsN9O=uYFDhQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> In my days of Perl, it was starting to become frowned upon to call
> subroutines without parenthesizing arguments.  Is that no longer the
> case? 

​As I understand it, there are several reasons not to make function calls in Perl without parenthesis.  Whether they are good reasons is a question for the user.  Modern Perl chapter 5 covers most of them.

__________________________________________________________________________________
Mike Blackwell | Technical Analyst, Distribution Services/Rollout Management | RR Donnelley
1750 Wallace Ave | St Charles, IL 60174-3401 
Office: 630.313.7818 
Mike.Blackwell@rrd.com
http://www.rrdonnelley.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench unusable after crash during pgbench