Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL
Date
Msg-id CAJGNTeNVBMDzxwi=QaJWbeVequf1oENF9GbFaRMfny9H6ic_Ng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12 August 2015 at 20:19, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> But where does this belong?  Core?  Its own separate extension?
>

I will say core. Gin indexes are in core and i don't see why this
function shouldn't.
FWIW, brin indexes has a similar function brin_summarize_new_values() in core

--
Jaime Casanova                      www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: LISTEN *
Next
From: Mike Blackwell
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.