On 22 March 2017 at 03:35, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 22 March 2017 at 09:49, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>>> Overall, though, I think that 0001 looks far better than any previous
>>> iteration. It's simple. It looks safe. It seems unlikely to break
>>> anything that works now. Woo hoo!
>>
>> Funny that this started with "hey, here's a simple, non-invasive
>> function for looking up the status of an arbitrary xid".
>
> Changes made per discussion.
This looks good to me also. Does what we need it to do.
I was a little worried by possible performance of new lock, but its
not intended to be run frequently, so its OK.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
